Article. Future Think - The Wizard and his Magical Machines
Gideon Ariel puts the Computer to the Service of Sport
Published on Thursday, July 1, 1976 by Kent Gordis
The Wizard and His Magical Machines
Gideon Ariel Puts die Computer to die Service of Sport
Kent K. Gordis
In the future, the work of Gideon Ariel will affect how we train.
Since 1971, when he first brought his high. tech visions to U.S. Olympic track and field training camps, Ariel, an expatriate Israeli who’s now an American citizen, has played what many consider to be the leading role in a budding field called computerized biomechanical analysis
More recently, his devices and insights have aided U.S. Olympic athletes, including Steve Ilcgg, 40(x)-meter pursuit gold medalist, and the 1984 women’s volleyball team, which won a silver medal in Los Angeles. In the future, marathon runners, joggers and tennis players may also benefit from his contributions.
Adviser to Olympians
the year was 1975. American discus thrower Mac Wilkins felt confident he could perform well at the upcoming 1976 Montreal Olympics. let his throws always seemed to fall shy of the standard established by the East Germans. Coaches and advisers tried to help, but to no avail. This is when Gideon Ariel, a one-time Olympic discus thrower for Israel and a scientist dedicated to studying sport, stepped in. lie was sure Mac Wilkins could easily beat the East Germans.
Ariel was convinced Wilkins’s problem resided in his throwing motion. Using highspeed motion picture cameras and sensors that linked Wilkins’s body to computers, Ariel established that the athlete was buckling his leg as lie threw the disc.
Made aware of the power-robbing flaw, Wilkins changed his form and went on to win the gold medal at Montreal with a world record throw of 241 feet.
Ariel’s contributions to training have not concentrated solely on the elite, however. He gale a boost to the weight training boom when he used his computers to design the cam on the Nautilus exercise machines Ironically, he eventually drew on his findings to question Nautilus developer Arthur Jones’s claims that the machines exercise muscles in a complete range of motion.
“We found that the design of the cam is only a compromise.” Ariel explained from his Trabuco Canyon, California, research center. “If you swing the weights too fast, the cam will make them fly away, from you. Jones claims that because of this you have to use the machines slowly – but this is forcing the athlete to adapt to the machine and not vice versa.”
Ultimate Exercise Machine
As a result Ariel, 46, took on a project to create the ultimate exercise machine. lie knew from the start he was looking for a machine with a computerized brain that would adapt to each athlete’s body form and range of motion instead of forcing the trainee to change style to fit the device.
lie also knew that instant feedback would be a necessity and decided to incorporate a video monitor into the apparatus. Perhaps most importantly, he designed the machine to be free of inertia and gravity.
“What we have is basically a hydraulically operated system that’s controlled by a computer,” he explained..”And if I put an athlete like a shot-putter on the machine, it can start with a certain resistance (that permits a range of motion of) 10 degrees per second, and end with another (that permits) 30 degrees per second. This kind of computer-operated machine will adapt to the velocities which are the most favorable to his specific activity. No other machine can do this.”
Lest he appear biased, Ariel was quick to add that his device is non the only computer-operated machine capable of such feats.
lie also paid a lot of attention to the quality of feedback that the athlete could review. “We developed two ways to see your results,” Arid continued. “The first way is to see your output on colored graphs. Or you can create a split screen with your output on one side and the world champion’s output on the other.”
lie added that when videotapes of both the subject and the world’s best are available, the monitor can show split screen images of the two athletes. Die complete unit retails for $16,500.
Now Ariel, a Ph.D. in exercise science from the University of Massachusetts, is delving into the field of cycling.
“It’s a great, fascinating sport, because of the complex interactions between the hike and the rider,” he explained. “The equations involved in cycling dynamics are extremely complicated.” Ariel noted that the added inertia and aerodynamic factors created by the bicycle contribute to the difficulty of analyzing cycling motions.
“But the hardest thing about cycling,” he continued, “is simply the fact that the motions are in so many planes. As the cyclist pedals, he tilts the bicycle hack and firth and into an infinite series of planes.” Only with stationary bicycles can Ariel’s team begin to analyze cyclists. But he laments: “This is not a very realistic situation.”
Using the technology of his exercise machine, Ariel has developed a computerized hike linked to a video monitor. “Both machines are resistance mechanisms,” he noted. “For the bicycle machine we simply added a bikeï¿½ where there was a bench before. Our basic gu:d with the bicycle machine was to measure what is the basically isokinetic’ force of cycling. And on this machine the cyclist will he able to determine the force he or she wants to reach. Let’s say tie wants 00 percent of his maximum (force) and more resistance in the first 10 degrees than in the last 10 degrees of the pedal stroke. All he has to do is enter this information in the computer.”
Ariel first officially displayed this computerized hike at the Hilton Corporation Tennis Show in Los Angeles in late October. 1984. The bicycle machine, complete with computer, will retail for 19,5(K). The bicycle device alone will sell for $4,5(x), he said. Its cost is significantly less than the exercise machine because it doesn’t require the expensive hydraulics of the general exercise device, he added.
“We’ve already received 62 orders fur (the cycling machine) and we haven’t even introduced it yet,” Ariel said.
Prior to the summer Olympics, Ariel worked with Raleigh and Steve Hegg in an attempt to arrive at the most efficient equipment design. “Raleigh came to me with that funny looking hike tlegg used at the Olympics,” Ariel explained. “We worked on its structural and aerodynamic characteristics within the parameters of the 4000-meter pursuit.”
During his research, he discovered that, when Ilegg accelerates at the start of the event, the bike’s small 24-inch front wheel doesn’t touch the ground for the first three or four pedal strokes.
“We told him to lean over more to keep his front wheel on the track,” he said.
lem is, Steve’s legs are so powerful, he could flip the hike over.” Ariel added he has worked with Raleigh to design a new version of the “funny hike” that places more of the rider’s weight over the front wheel, to hold it down.
Ariel’s work has also brought him to study the question of saddle height. The generally accepted rule-of-thumb in the United States has been to place the heel on the pedal and raise the seat until the leg is fully extended. But when Cgrille Guimard, coach of the crack professional Renault racing team, took his riders through a series of tests hack in 1980, he found the optimal position to be 2.5 centimeters (about one inch) higher.
How does Ariel determine position?
“It is difficult to say,” he conceded. “But it’s true we’ve found a higher saddle usually results in more speed and force even if it’s less comfortable.” Ariel explained his findings metaphorically. “Everybody knows you can stand up with 500 pounds on your shoulders, but you can’t squat with that much – it’s a similar thing with saddle height.”
The technique Ariel used to determine saddle height is straightforward. “At first we tried different heights at, say one-quarter inch increments. We measured the athlete’s shank and thigh. Then we placed transducers on his legs and let him ride, with the computer calculating the data.”
In these tests, close approximations of road riding were assured by placing the bicycle on rollers, rather than using a stationary bicycle, he added.
The same tests have led to some interesting conclusions on the pedaling stroke. the most efficient stroke, he has found, involves keeping the ankle as perpendicular as possible to the primary range of motion. “But since this is a rotary motion, you really can’t do that.” he clarified. “Thu can’t put your foot at a 90 degree angle to the primary motion when it’s at the top or the bottom of the stroke – and to attempt it would be dangerous.”
Ariel has determined that focusing force on the principal up and down strokes is usually the most effective method of pedaling. He also discovered that taping the ankles slightly can direct more of the cyclist’s force into the vectors of the primary motion.
Ariel has also consulted with Shimano in their development of the aerodynamic pedals currently being sold on the American market.
Spying on the Soviets
Another major aspect of his work has involved comparing the dynamics of American athletes with that of Eastern Bloc stars. “But when, for example, we want to measure the dynamics of foreign athletes such as the Soviets, we can’t wire them up because they obviously won’t let us,” he lamented. “So, we use the indirect method only.”
Unlike laboratory tests that combine measurement of actual motion with computer transferred high-speed cinematography, Ariel uses only the second method with Iron Curtain athletes.
After filming the individuals under study, Ariel returns to his center where the film is isolated in one plane of motion and then projected onto a screen covered with a grid of hundreds of tiny microphones. Using a sonic pen linked to a computer, he pinpoints, frame by frame, the location of the athlete’s limbs and other body parts. The computer then generates stick-figure representations of the athlete’s motion.
Although he concedes the indirect method is not quite as exact, it has played a crucial role in bettering American performances in a number of sports, he said.
In the past 18 months, Ariel has also expanded his fields of interest into footwear. He has been commissioned by the Pony shoe company, a subsidiary of Adidas, as a product researcher.
“V6’e have developed a number of shoes for them,” he noted, “including a computerized shoe that calculates stress points on the foot.”
Ariel added that the shoe, currently used only for lab testing, might one day be marketed by Pony.
He has also developed a revolutionary marathon shoe. “Our tests showed that long-distance runners need a harder shoe. We are now developing a distance shoe with a two-part
sole, one for the heel, one for the ball of the foot, for the best possible support.”
In addition, Ariel has developed Pony’s weight lifting shoe, which features a detachable sole that allows each competitor to add the appropriate height for his needs. Another shoe he’s designed has an inflatable upper and would come in only three sizes, thus saving on inventory costs, he claims.
Meanwhile, Ariel is working with tennis instructor Vie Braden, chairman of the board at the center, to slow down the speed of tennis balls.
“The problem with tennis balls is that for the millions of average tennis players, the balls are too fast,” Ariel emphasized. “For the average Joe who likes to play on weekends, the game is just too fast. So, at first we were involved in developing larger rackets. Now, we’ve been looking into slowing down the ball by making it larger and softer.” Although illegal in competition, the slow ball has been a tremendous success with Braden’s students, Ariel said.
He’s also scrutinized the color of halls used in sports. “We’ve found that the color most people respond to is a dark orange or a light red. We’ve developed orange and red balls for tennis, volleyball, baseball and other sports.”
From Mac Wilkins and the esoteric computerized research involved in improving his performance, to something as apparently mundane as determining the color of tennis balls, the two constants in Gideon Ariel’s work have been his fascination with the human body and how it performs, and his refusal to take anything for granted.